The Next New Thing

Kill more bills.

Granola
Granola
Loom
Loom
1Password
1Password
Substack
Substack
HubSpot
HubSpot
Grammarly
Grammarly
Google Analytics
Google Analytics
Google Drive
Google Drive
Intercom
Intercom
Zoom
Zoom

It's about more than free.
It's about the ability to build!

Timestamps and links below.

1 of 10

Granola vs Doodle Note

01 / 10GranolavsDoodle Note
01 / 10GranolavsDoodle Note
Granola

But:

It's not that it sits in on the meetings.

The big issue is that it sends your meetings to their servers.

Your lawsuit strategy is on their servers.

Your private information is on their servers.

01 / 10GranolavsDoodle Note
Granola

And Granola gets expensive.

01 / 10GranolavsDoodle Note
Doodle Note

A guy I met got frustrated with the fees and lack of customization.

He created his own local meeting notetaker.

Then he shared it on GitHub so you could use it.

01 / 10GranolavsDoodle Note
Doodle Note

Like Granola, it does not slam a bot into your Zoom and recordings happen in real time.

But unlike Granola, your meeting is not uploaded.

01 / 10GranolavsDoodle Note
Doodle Note

Call transcripts are on your computer, and you can have your agent search them.

01 / 10GranolavsDoodle Note
Doodle Note

Here is what Doodle Note ships:

  • No bot. It captures your mic and the other side of the call on your computer
  • Transcription on the device. The audio never leaves
  • Notes from a local model, or a key you bring
  • Ask anything about one meeting, or all of them
  • Mac on Apple Silicon now. Windows is still beta
01 / 10GranolavsDoodle Note
Doodle Note

Worth Noticing:

Two GitHub stars. The app is still being updated. Windows is beta. The phone app is not out. You are early. The MIT code is real. Hosted sync is a separate $10 a month bill if you want notes on every device.

Stars
2
Forks
Releases
v0.4.17
License
MIT
2 of 10

Loom vs Cap

02 / 10LoomvsCap
02 / 10LoomvsCap
Loom

But:

Your product demo lives on their servers.

Your bug report lives on their servers.

When you share a video, they use it to promote Loom to your viewers.

02 / 10LoomvsCap
Loom

Their prices climb to $240 a year.

02 / 10LoomvsCap
Cap

Then a company built the open source Loom alternative.

Cap went on GitHub in November 2023. 21,000 stars. 82 releases. It is shipping.

Cap is the open source alternative to Loom.

02 / 10LoomvsCap
Cap

You can save the file on your computer and share it, for free.

Or use their cloud for up to 5-minute videos, for free.

Or use your account on cloud storage solutions, like AWS.

02 / 10LoomvsCap
Cap

Here is what Cap ships:

  • Screen, camera, and microphone in one recording
  • Instant Mode for a share link as soon as you hit stop
  • Studio Mode for a polished local edit, with backgrounds, zooms, trimming, and captions
  • Desktop apps for Mac and Windows
02 / 10LoomvsCap
Cap

Worth Noticing:

  • Instant Mode's free cap is short.
  • Cap's website asks for a commercial licence if you use the official app for client work.
  • Self-hosting is a real job: Docker, storage, a public URL, and you keep it patched.
Stars
21,392
Forks
1,838
Releases
82
License
AGPL-3.0
3 of 10

1Password vs Vaultwarden

03 / 101PasswordvsVaultwarden
03 / 101PasswordvsVaultwarden
1Password

But:

The app that used to fill a login in a second now waits.

Search in a big vault lags.

The keyboard shortcut misses.

It feels like a website you have to wait on, not the app you already paid for.

03 / 101PasswordvsVaultwarden
Vaultwarden

Then someone wrote an unofficial Bitwarden-compatible server and gave it away.

Vaultwarden went on GitHub in February 2018. 66,000 stars. That is not a toy password form. That is a server a lot of people actually run.

03 / 101PasswordvsVaultwarden
Vaultwarden

There is no Vaultwarden iPhone app. You install the official Bitwarden apps. Phone, desktop, browser, and the command line. Then you point the server address at yours. The clients are Bitwarden's. The vault lives on your box.

Say that slowly, because the confusion is the whole risk. Do not install a knockoff app. Organizations, collections, and team sharing work, and they are free on a server you host. You are the security team now.

03 / 101PasswordvsVaultwarden
Vaultwarden

66,563 stars. 3,172 forks. 86 releases. AGPL-3.0. On GitHub since February 2018.

It works with the official Bitwarden apps. iPhone, Android, and the Chrome extension. You point them at your server.

Bitwarden on iPhone
iPhone
Bitwarden on Android
Android
Bitwarden in Chrome
Chrome
03 / 101PasswordvsVaultwarden
Vaultwarden

Here is what Vaultwarden ships:

  • A personal vault that the official Bitwarden apps already know how to talk to
  • Organizations, collections, and password sharing, without a per-seat upgrade on the server
  • Attachments, sends, and emergency access
  • Two-step login, including authenticator apps, hardware keys, and email
  • An admin page for the person who is actually running the box
03 / 101PasswordvsVaultwarden
Vaultwarden

Worth Noticing:

If the box dies and you have no backup, those passwords are gone.

Stars
66,563
Forks
3,172
Releases
86
License
AGPL-3.0
4 of 10

Substack vs Ghost

04 / 10SubstackvsGhost
04 / 10SubstackvsGhost
Substack

But:

Substack charges rent on your readers.

And the more subscribers you get, the more they charge you.

04 / 10SubstackvsGhost
Substack

The moment someone pays you, Substack takes 10% of every transaction, forever, with no cap.

04 / 10SubstackvsGhost
Ghost

Then a non-profit built the publishing platform and put it under MIT.

Ghost went on GitHub in May 2013. 55,000 stars. 1,002 releases. This is a 13-year-old publishing company that happens to give the software away.

04 / 10SubstackvsGhost
Ghost

Ghost takes 0% of your revenue.

  • Paid memberships are built in.
  • The publication lives on your domain, in your design, with your brand.
  • Substack is a feed you rent. Ghost is a site you own.
04 / 10SubstackvsGhost
Ghost

Here is what Ghost ships:

  • A real website for the publication, not only an email
  • Member signups, free or paid, with monthly and yearly tiers
  • 0% of your payments (Stripe still takes its processing fee)
  • Your own domain and your own design
  • Self-host it, or use their official hosted service, which funds the non-profit
04 / 10SubstackvsGhost
Ghost

Worth Noticing:

Self-hosting Ghost is a work. Their hosted plan exists because most writers do not want that job, and the money from it funds the software.

Stars
55,093
Forks
11,928
Releases
1,002
License
MIT
5 of 10

HubSpot CRM vs Twenty

05 / 10HubSpot CRMvsTwenty
05 / 10HubSpot CRMvsTwenty
HubSpot CRM

But:

The free CRM is the hook. Sequences, forecasting, and custom reporting sit behind Professional.

The bill is per seat, and it jumps when you want the sales tools.

You came for a contact book. You leave paying for a platform.

05 / 10HubSpot CRMvsTwenty
HubSpot CRM

HubSpot Sales Hub Professional is $90 a seat a month, billed annually. That is $1,080 a year.

05 / 10HubSpot CRMvsTwenty
Twenty

Then a team put an open source CRM on GitHub.

Twenty is the CRM you can run yourself.

05 / 10HubSpot CRMvsTwenty
Twenty

You can self-host it.

Contacts, companies, pipelines, and workflows live on a box you own.

You can also use their cloud if you do not want to run a server.

05 / 10HubSpot CRMvsTwenty
Twenty

Here is what Twenty ships:

  • Contacts, companies, and deal pipelines you can reshape
  • Custom objects and fields, with no extra seat tax for that
  • Workflows, plus email and calendar on the records
  • An API you can build on
05 / 10HubSpot CRMvsTwenty
Twenty

Worth Noticing:

GitHub labels the licence Other because some files are commercial. The bulk of the code is AGPL-3.0. Twenty Cloud Pro is $9 a user a month.

Stars
55,958
Forks
8,850
Releases
110
License
AGPL-3.0 with commercial-licensed files
6 of 10

Grammarly vs LanguageTool

06 / 10GrammarlyvsLanguageTool
06 / 10GrammarlyvsLanguageTool
Grammarly

But:

Grammarly keeps trying to upsell you.

Every time you use it they are promoting and pushing the paid version.

06 / 10GrammarlyvsLanguageTool
Grammarly

Grammarly Pro is $144 a member a year.

06 / 10GrammarlyvsLanguageTool
LanguageTool

Then a team put a writing checker on GitHub.

LanguageTool is the open source writing checker. It works in more than 30 languages.

06 / 10GrammarlyvsLanguageTool
LanguageTool

You can run the checker on your own machine.

Point the browser add-on at a local server.

Your sentences do not have to leave the room.

06 / 10GrammarlyvsLanguageTool
LanguageTool

The free self-hosted copy does not include LanguageTool's paid rules or the AI paraphraser. Those stay on their cloud. Grammarly still wins English tone. LanguageTool wins the other languages.

06 / 10GrammarlyvsLanguageTool
LanguageTool

Here is what LanguageTool ships:

  • Grammar, spelling, and punctuation checks
  • More than 30 languages and dialects
  • A browser add-on and a desktop editor
  • A server you can run yourself
06 / 10GrammarlyvsLanguageTool
LanguageTool

Worth Noticing:

Grammarly Pro (as well as LanguageTool's own paid Premium tier) uses proprietary, closed-source AI models to offer complex sentence rewrites, tone detection, and fluency improvements.

The local version cannot perform these deep structural rewrites.

Stars
14,899
Forks
1,569
Releases
License
LGPL-2.1
7 of 10

Google Analytics vs Umami

07 / 10Google AnalyticsvsUmami
Google Analytics

But:

Google gets every visit.

Google gets the page they lingered on.

Google gets the campaign that brought them.

The standard product is free. The cost is the data.

07 / 10Google AnalyticsvsUmami
Google Analytics

Free, until they own every visitor.

07 / 10Google AnalyticsvsUmami
Umami

No cookies. No personal data collected by default.

Traffic, campaigns, behavior, and conversions on a box you host.

Or on their cloud, if you do not want to run a server.

07 / 10Google AnalyticsvsUmami
Umami
  • No conversion funnels
  • No ad network syncing
  • Makes it difficult to calculate true return on ad spend
  • Doesn't provide deep cohort analysis for product-market fit
07 / 10Google AnalyticsvsUmami
Umami

Umami:

  • Privacy-focused: No personal tracking data collected.
  • No cookie banners: Fully compliant with GDPR and CCPA out of the box.
  • Fast loading: Tiny script size (~3KB) keeps website performance high.
  • Accurate metrics: Bypasses most ad blockers to capture true traffic counts.
  • Total data ownership: Open-source code allows for complete self-hosting.
  • Simple interface: Clean, minimalist dashboard focuses on essential data.
07 / 10Google AnalyticsvsUmami
Umami

Worth Noticing:

W3Techs still has Google Analytics on about half the web. You still have to add the script and keep the box healthy.

Stars
38,473
Forks
7,902
Releases
110
License
MIT
8 of 10

Google Drive vs Nextcloud

08 / 10Google DrivevsNextcloud
08 / 10Google DrivevsNextcloud
Google Drive

But:

Your files live in Google Drive.

Your contracts live in Google Drive.

And if they change the rules, you need to leave, which is hard.

08 / 10Google DrivevsNextcloud
Google Drive

Google AI Pro is $199.99 a year for 5 TB.

08 / 10Google DrivevsNextcloud
Nextcloud

You put the files on a machine you can point at.

It syncs with phones and laptops.

You share a link with access you control.

08 / 10Google DrivevsNextcloud
Nextcloud

You become the person who keeps it running. End-to-end encryption is not finished. Desktop sync can be buggy. If nobody on the team wants to own upgrades, the Google seat was buying you an operations department.

08 / 10Google DrivevsNextcloud
Nextcloud

Here is what Nextcloud ships:

  • Files on a server you choose, not a drive you rent
  • Sync to the computers and phones you already have
  • Sharing, with access you control
  • Contacts and calendars in the same home as the files
  • A huge app catalog. Mail, video, whatever you actually need
08 / 10Google DrivevsNextcloud
Nextcloud

Worth Noticing:

Self-hosting is the real product, and it is an ops job. You patch it. You back it up. You get HTTPS right. Nextcloud GmbH will sell you enterprise support and a hosted option if you do not want that job.

Stars
36,650
Forks
5,146
Releases
466
License
AGPL-3.0
9 of 10

Intercom vs Chatwoot

09 / 10IntercomvsChatwoot
09 / 10IntercomvsChatwoot
Intercom

But:

You have to pay for every person who answers your customers.

09 / 10IntercomvsChatwoot
Intercom

The Intercom Expert plan is $1,584 a seat a year.

09 / 10IntercomvsChatwoot
Chatwoot

Chatwoot consolidates customer interactions from live chat, email, WhatsApp, and social media into a single view.

09 / 10IntercomvsChatwoot
Chatwoot

It is one inbox. Live chat on the site. Email. WhatsApp. Instagram. Telegram. The agent sees the person, not the channel. That is the Intercom job that actually hurts when it is expensive. Product tours and marketing campaigns are a different Intercom. Chatwoot does not win that fight.

09 / 10IntercomvsChatwoot
Chatwoot

Chatwoot enables AI agents to respond to messages, but only on their paid plan.

09 / 10IntercomvsChatwoot
Chatwoot

Here is what Chatwoot ships:

  • One inbox for live chat, email, WhatsApp, Instagram, Telegram, and the rest
  • A help center so people can answer themselves
  • Private notes, labels, canned replies, and assignment
  • Contact profiles and the history of what they asked
  • Reports: conversations, agents, satisfaction
09 / 10IntercomvsChatwoot
Chatwoot

Worth Noticing:

Think QuickBooks versus SlowBooks. The free core does the job. The extra bits cost money.

Stars
36,341
Forks
8,768
Releases
150
License
MIT on core; enterprise/ folder is a separate commercial licence
10 of 10

Zoom vs Jitsi Meet

10 / 10ZoomvsJitsi Meet
10 / 10ZoomvsJitsi Meet
Zoom

But:

The free Zoom meeting cuts off at 40 minutes.

A webinar is a separate bill.

Your "private" room still sits on Zoom's servers.

10 / 10ZoomvsJitsi Meet
Zoom

Zoom Pro is $170 a user a year.

10 / 10ZoomvsJitsi Meet
Jitsi Meet

Meanwhile, Jitsi Meet has been on GitHub since 2013, and you can use it without buying a seat.

10 / 10ZoomvsJitsi Meet
Jitsi Meet

A guest does not need an account to join. They click a link. They are in the room. HD video, screen sharing, chat, a raise-hand, polls. It is a meeting. It is not a webinar product.

10 / 10ZoomvsJitsi Meet
Jitsi Meet

meet.jit.si is a public instance. Anyone can try it. It is not your server. Room names on a public server can be guessable. The click-a-link magic is the demo. The product you can stake a company on is the instance you host.

10 / 10ZoomvsJitsi Meet
Jitsi Meet

Here is what Jitsi Meet ships:

  • A meeting in the browser, on the phones, on the apps
  • Guests join from a link
  • Screen sharing, chat, reactions, polls
  • Mobile apps and a way for other products to embed calls
  • A public instance you can try, and a path to run your own
10 / 10ZoomvsJitsi Meet
Jitsi Meet

Worth Noticing:

Self-hosting is the real Zoom replacement. meet.jit.si is a shared public room, not a private stack. Video infrastructure is an ops job — certificates, bandwidth, phones that refuse a bad cert. The Jitsi team also sells a hosted option. Zoom still wins a fifty-person webinar.

Stars
29,841
Forks
8,012
Releases
87
License
Apache-2.0